Sunday, August 12, 2012

ActionResult Vs ViewResult


1. ActionResult is an abstract class, and it's base class for ViewResult class.
2. In MVC framework, it uses ActionResult class to reference the object your action method returns. And invokes ExecuteResult method on it.
3. It's usually a good practice to have your method return a more specific class. So if you are sure that your action method will return some view page, you can use ViewResult. But if your action method may have different behavior, like either render a view or perform a redirection. You can use the more general base class ActionResult as the return type.
4. You can absolutely use specific return types, even though most examples on the web seems to return the ActionResult. The only time I would return the ActionResult class is when different paths of the action method returns different subtypes.
5.

6. Steven Sanderson also recommends returning specific types in his book Pro ASP.NET MVC Framework. Take a look at the quote below:

"This action method specifically declares that it returns an instance of ViewResult. It would work just the same if instead the method return type was ActionResult (the base class for all action results). In fact, some ASP.NET MVC programmers declare all their action methods as returning a nonspecific ActionResult, even if they know for sure that it will always return one particular subclass. However, it's a well-established principle in object-oriented programming that methods should return the most specific type they can (as well as accepting the most general parameter types they can). Following this principle maximizes convenience and flexibility for code that calls your method, such as your unit tests."

1 comment: